<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexander-girgis.de/2010/02/20/google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexander-girgis.de/2010/02/20/google-wave/</link>
	<description>The small world of Alexander Girgis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RainerB</title>
		<link>http://www.alexander-girgis.de/2010/02/20/google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>RainerB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexander-girgis.de/?p=100#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Chris Brogran (http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-i-came-to-love-google-wave/) has also written a good article about Google Wave. At first he also had no use for it, like it was with twitter. 
One paragraph from the article: &quot;The “light” is that this tool is better than email about going back and forth, and also, if you use it well (I’m learning to keep the “blips” at the top as the “gold” stuff, and use the blips below a certain point as the “chatter”), then you’ll see obvious and instant reasons for using it. But if you have no obvious collaboration project to try it on, it doesn’t immediately make sense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Brogran (<a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-i-came-to-love-google-wave/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-i-came-to-love-google-wave/</a>) has also written a good article about Google Wave. At first he also had no use for it, like it was with twitter.<br />
One paragraph from the article: &#8220;The “light” is that this tool is better than email about going back and forth, and also, if you use it well (I’m learning to keep the “blips” at the top as the “gold” stuff, and use the blips below a certain point as the “chatter”), then you’ll see obvious and instant reasons for using it. But if you have no obvious collaboration project to try it on, it doesn’t immediately make sense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

